On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:29:58 +0200 (CEST) "Thomas Bohn" <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, April 1, 2009 11:00, M Rawash wrote: > > > a more obvious choice would be to stick with archlinux+ABS, remember > > we're just dropping BINARY package support, arch's build tools will > > remain the same, think of it as a less sucky gentoo. > > To compile mplayer on my Atom N270 takes forever, I can't imagine to > compile X or Firefox on that machine. > > Thomas > > distcc/crosscompiling etc. you can compile on your 64bit box for 32bit. sounds like a cool project, maintaining some tools and scripts to do that on arch. Xyne has probably already written it. Dieter
