On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 10:28 +0200, Thomas Bohn wrote: > On Wed, April 1, 2009 10:09, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > > This was posted in march. And it's discussed on the developer mailing > > list and voted for. Personally I also agree they made a good choice. > > Okay, what is the alternative? Especially if you don't want end up with > Debian-based distributions? a more obvious choice would be to stick with archlinux+ABS, remember we're just dropping BINARY package support, arch's build tools will remain the same, think of it as a less sucky gentoo. cheers.. > Thomas >
