Re: [Fwd: [arch-announce] Dropping i686 support]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, April 1, 2009 10:31, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:

> How do you mean alternative? there is no need for alternatives because
> the decision was only made because we all agreed pretty much everyone
> is using 64bit now anyway.

I doubt that, besides I'm currently using Arch on my eeePC and even if I
get a new (64 bits) computer anytime soon, I won't maintain two different
distro on both computers. So I'm looking for a new distro to replace Arch.

> For atom-based mobile devices you could use android or something.

Adroid doesn't seem ready for netbook use yet. This might change but I
don't think that I will get my current workflow working on Android.

Thomas



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux