Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Jan de Groot <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 20:42 -0200, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> >>> I know that Arch Linux don't support these directories as tmpfs or >>> "all >>> empty" by default, but with these trivial patches to rc-script can >>> support it. >>> Not only this is usefull for "tmpfs", maybe for other things. >>> >> Having initscripts for daemons just to create this path (policykit) or >> let other packages create the required directories instead (hal that >> creates policykit directories?) isn't the most trivial thing in my >> opinion. >> > > Still, I think this had potential. We can already see that it would be > useful on some netbooks, so I think it's a step in the right > direction. > > While this may be a non-trivial change, I do see the benefit, so I'd > like to implement this _in theory_ at some point. So keep up the good > work and we'll see where we can get with this. I'd recommend filing a > feature request in the bug tracker > > Thank you very much for good efforts. :) Well, in the case of non-trivial patch of PolicyKit, this apparently will become obsolete in the near future and will be replaced by a new implementation polkit [1] / eggdbus [2]. It is possible that the situation will change radically. I will create a feature request to the FS that globalized packages that are required to be friendly with the desired behavior. Like in the initial email. Again, thanks for your time, good luck ;) [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/polkit-devel/2009-January/000070.html [2] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2008-December/msg00059.html -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
