2009/1/17 Baho Utot <baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> The tools are in a broken state until pacman 3.3 >> >> To be more correct and polite, let's say the packages are currently in >> a transition period related to info pages handling, and the tools have >> no workarounds for making this transition period smoother until 3.3. > > Well Ok if you want to be politically correct we will say that. > > As you may well already know I am _NOT_ politically correct and tend to say > what the situation is sans the sugar. I think Xavier intended to point out that the tools are perfectly sane, actually some *packages* are broken until they conform to the tools' current state. Corrado
