Re: Pointless to use non-md5 for makepkg INTEGRITY_CHECK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:11:25PM -0500, Aaron Schaefer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Aaron Schaefer <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > I made a patch and submitted it to pacman-dev, so the work is
>> > done...if you chose to implement it.
>>
>> Nix that...forgot pacman-dev was protected, so I have filed a feature
>> request with the patch. There has been a bit more
>> discussion/clarification there as well, if anyone cares:
>
> What's pacman-dev protected from?

I think he meant he wasn't subscribed :)


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux