On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently, however, couldn't you just supply both md5 and sha1 > checksums to cover all bases? You could put them both in the PKGBUILD in order to be able to upload it to the AUR, but anyone who downloads it would get verification errors unless they updated their makepkg.conf to match the INTEGRITY_CHECK settings that were used when the PKGBUILD was created. If they did change it, they would have to change it back in order to prevent errors when compiling anything else. Once that patch gets pushed to the public, what do people think about switching over to sha256 as a default instead of md5 due to potential collision/security issues? -- Aaron "ElasticDog" Schaefer
