On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Aaron Schaefer <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I addressed this "upstream" in an earlier patch, so this will be fixed >> in pacman 3.3.0: >> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=496b687c3d4a56641051700e7c4e5e21b9c6607c;hp=baf58525553db8f1e680de16793b147c88df59e2 >> >> -Dan > > Fantastic! I hadn't thought to look at the git repos for the current > versions of everything...I look forward to the fixes being pushed! Currently, however, couldn't you just supply both md5 and sha1 checksums to cover all bases?