Re: Pointless to use non-md5 for makepkg INTEGRITY_CHECK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Aaron Schaefer <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I addressed this "upstream" in an earlier patch, so this will be fixed
>> in pacman 3.3.0:
>> http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=496b687c3d4a56641051700e7c4e5e21b9c6607c;hp=baf58525553db8f1e680de16793b147c88df59e2
>>
>> -Dan
>
> Fantastic! I hadn't thought to look at the git repos for the current
> versions of everything...I look forward to the fixes being pushed!

Currently, however, couldn't you just supply both md5 and sha1
checksums to cover all bases?


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux