On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Amanai <amanai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:27:32 -0700, Xavier <shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Amanai <amanai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Is there no maintaince on udev anymore? >> >> This is my fault. I grabbed maintainership of udev when Tobias took a >> vacation, and real life has hit me like a sack of bricks, so I have >> little time these days to do much. >> >> This Wed afternoon I plan on running through all my outdated packages >> and updating them. I will make udev a priority. >> >> Cheers, >> Aaron >> > > Udev is a ton of work. Right now, we use a mix of udev upstream rules and > our own rules, and we should probably switch to upstream rules as much as > possible. But that means lots of testing and stuff and lots of reading rules > and see if they are right for Arch. And of course, updating klibc-udev to > the same state as udev. I wanted to do it once, then didn't have the time. Yeah, I know. As far as I'm aware we use as many vanilla rules as possible, with only one smallish file of Arch rules.
