On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alessio Bolognino <themolok.ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Pacman's changelog support was added to reflect "package's changes", not > "upstream changes"; that's what frugalware devs are doing, and they use > (almost) the same package manager. Interesting, it seems you're correct. It looks like the only way to know this, though, is to look at the changelog.proto file. None of the pacman documentation alludes to this fact, so I always assumed it was upstream changes. Considering this is the case, I'm with Peter - why not just automatically update the changelog from svn commit messages? Otherwise I'm having a hard time believing that packagers will ever start writing them... Scott
