Hi, Xavier wrote:
That's what provisions are for.
Wouln't that require that e.g. tetex and texlive have something like? provides=( "tex" )In practice, how many packages include such a generic provides entry? From what I've seen most packages' depends rely solely on the package name.
I think there will always be a case where an alternate dependency would better be specified by the package name.
Regards, Neil Darlow
