On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:31:18 +0100 Xavier <shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stefano Esposito wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:18:24 +0100 > > solsTiCe d'Hiver<solstice.dhiver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> hi. > >>> IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to > >>> programming a GUI. > >> what do you mean by that ? > >> > >> i wonder why after pacman is finally splitted into two with a > >> library like libalpm, we do not see more GUI popping up... > >> > >> i have tried to use libalpm just to see; it's not easy but i am a > >> newbie at programming in C. anyone ? > >> > >> > > > > I'm trying to write a python binding to be used in the next future > > of gtkpacman. By now i've implemented just alpm_db* (with a Database > > class), alpm_pkg* (with a Package class) and alpm_option* (with an > > Alpm class). If anyone wants to take a look it's on berlios.de, > > project pyalpm (you'll need pyrex to compile the module). Of course > > is totally not documented :). Any help in the project would be very > > appreciated, so if anyone is intersted feel free to contact me ;) > > > > Hm, do we have 2 pyalpm now? > http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/pyalpm/trunk/ > http://svn.archlinux-projects.org/repos/pyalpm/trunk/src/ > Well... I think I'll contribute to that on archlinux-projects and drop mine bindings :) Is the project still active? And who's the author (i'm not able to find (s)he on archlinux-projects.org :)) -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: New Giorno e Notte Plus: ordina il prodotto dimagrante n° 1 in Italia * * Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=7109&d=8-2
