Stefano Esposito wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:18:24 +0100
solsTiCe d'Hiver<solstice.dhiver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi.
IMHO, at the actually status of pacman, is a suicide go to
programming a GUI.
what do you mean by that ?
i wonder why after pacman is finally splitted into two with a library
like libalpm, we do not see more GUI popping up...
i have tried to use libalpm just to see; it's not easy but i am a
newbie at programming in C. anyone ?
I'm trying to write a python binding to be used in the next future of
gtkpacman. By now i've implemented just alpm_db* (with a Database
class), alpm_pkg* (with a Package class) and alpm_option* (with an
Alpm class). If anyone wants to take a look it's on berlios.de, project
pyalpm (you'll need pyrex to compile the module). Of course is
totally not documented :). Any help in the project would be very
appreciated, so if anyone is intersted feel free to contact me ;)
Hm, do we have 2 pyalpm now?
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/pyalpm/trunk/
http://svn.archlinux-projects.org/repos/pyalpm/trunk/src/
