Re: XHTML > Set Content-Type as "application/xhtml+xml" for browsers that support it otherwise degrade to "text/html"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2 May 2011, at 19:26, Geoff Millikan wrote:

> PS. We'd consider using mod_negotiation to do this but we'd prefer not to make a HTML and XHTML of the same page.  We're just going
> to make one XHTML document and send it to everyone. The browsers that don't support XHTML will just have to do their best.

You should be able to do that with mod_negotiation.  Same file, different headers.

> PPS. The recommended Content-Type for XHTML documents (which despite mixed support, is W3C's recommended language for mobile
> browsers: http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#ddc ) is "application/xhtml+xml" but it's permitted to be "text/html." 

That'll be XHTML 1.0, Appendix C.  Or something cloned from it.
A rich source of confusion.

-- 
Nick Kew

Available for work, contract or permanent
http://www.webthing.com/~nick/cv.html


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux