On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Tapas Mishra <mightydreams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Every directive lists the context it is valid in. >> >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#accessfilename > So from above link it appears to me that accessfilename is valid in vhost > since it says > Context: server config, virtual host > but above reply by some kind soul says that my use of AccessFileName > in vhost definition is wrong I am not able to understand if it is > wrong then why is that wrong ? >> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/sections.html No, your usage is inside <Directory> context. It doesn't make it valid that it happens to be part of your server config or a virtualhost config. -- Eric Covener covener@xxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|