Hello,
I am wanting to clean up my Apache 2.2.9 (Debian Package) installation after modifying it to virtual host 7 domains in order to make it more robust, understandable, secure and maintainable. I want to have one of these sites being a SSL site.
-----
I have read the section on NameVirtualHost,
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/core.html#namevirtualhost
* Does NameVirtualHost get used in every entry in /etc/apache2/sites-available/ ? Is it redundant to include that declaration in all the others as well?
-----
The reason I ask this is I am having a warning delivered to me.
I initially have one website enabled. The entry in sites-available is defined like this:
NameVirtualHost *:80
<VirtualHost *:80>
....
</VirtualHost>
When I enable a second website whose entry is identical in layout, I reload and am told:
[warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
And when I comment out the NameVirtualHost *:80, for the second entry in sites-available, the warning is gone. This leads me to believe that this declaration is redundant.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks for your help!
Tim Legg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|