On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas >> <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > No. <VirtualHost _default_> match on IP address no other virtual host is >> > bound on (and I think only when no NameVirtualHost is specified). >> > >> > So, when someone configures <VirtualHost *> in addition to >> > <VirtualHost _default_> the _default_ will never match. > > On 27.04.09 09:35, Eric Covener wrote: >> You sure this doesn't boil down to the order of these two relative to >> eachother? Can you demonstrate ITT? > > Would be nice not to remove text I have answered. IMO your correction in the first paragraph is correct, and my followup is regarding the second paragraph. I didn't quite the misinformation because I believe both stand pretty well on their own. > the _default_ applies for IP addresses, not server names. Not in question in my followup. -- Eric Covener covener@xxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|