> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas > <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No. <VirtualHost _default_> match on IP address no other virtual host is > > bound on (and I think only when no NameVirtualHost is specified). > > > > So, when someone configures <VirtualHost *> in addition to > > <VirtualHost _default_> the _default_ will never match. On 27.04.09 09:35, Eric Covener wrote: > You sure this doesn't boil down to the order of these two relative to > eachother? Can you demonstrate ITT? Would be nice not to remove text I have answered. the _default_ applies for IP addresses, not server names. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released in first quarter of year 1901 --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|