Re: Idea for SSL with name-based Vhosts using two servers, mod_rewrite, and mod_proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Brian Mearns <mearns.b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Krist van Besien
> <krist.vanbesien@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Brian Mearns <mearns.b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Right, which I guess is a big problem for most use cases. For me, my
>>> certificate is self-signed anyway, and I already use it for multiple
>>> hostnames (myserver.net, www.myserver.net, web.myserver.net, which are
>>> all aliased to the same vhost in apache).
>>
>> Than there is no reason not to have the virtualhosts all on the same
>> server... Your solution is unnecessarily complicated.
>
> Is that possible if I want to serve both secure and unsecure (80 and
> 443)? If I just setup my root configuration (i.e., not in a vhost) to
> listen on port 80 and 443 and turn on the SSL engine, then all the
> content will be encrypted, won't it?

No, you can turn on SSL in a single virtualhost (<virtualhost *:443>)
and serve non-SSL from either the "base" server or another virtual
host (<virtualhost *:80>)

-- 
Eric Covener
covener@xxxxxxxxx

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux