On Feb 18, 2008 11:22 PM, howard chen <howachen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:49:09 +0800 > > > > "howard chen" <howachen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > SSI > > > === > > > > > > <!--#include virtual="modules/1.html" --> > > > <!--#include virtual="modules/2.html" --> > > > <!--#include virtual="modules/3.html" --> > > > <!--#include virtual="modules/4.html" --> > > > <!--#include virtual="modules/5.html" --> > > > > There is a subrequest per include, so SSI gets slower > > as the number of includes increases. > > > > > I also believe this could be probably the reasons behind. I haven;t > look into the code of SSI so I am not sure if Apache will have some > kind of caching if files to be included remain unchanged. Or will > Apache parse the SSI file every time? > > I agreed that these benchmark is theoretical only, but just get me surprised. > > Howard. Hello all, Some findings: http://people.apache.org/~sctemme/ApconUS2006/WE18/WE18_Performance_Up.ppt Server-side Includes - They break sendfile() This should be the reason I think. Howard --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|