Re: Server Side Include (SSI) is slower than PHP ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Nick Kew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:49:09 +0800
>
> "howard chen" <howachen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > SSI
>  > ===
>  >
>  > <!--#include virtual="modules/1.html" -->
>  > <!--#include virtual="modules/2.html" -->
>  > <!--#include virtual="modules/3.html" -->
>  > <!--#include virtual="modules/4.html" -->
>  > <!--#include virtual="modules/5.html" -->
>
>  There is a subrequest per include, so SSI gets slower
>  as the number of includes increases.
>


I also believe this could be probably the reasons behind. I haven;t
look into the code of SSI so I am not sure if Apache will have some
kind of caching if files to be included remain unchanged. Or will
Apache parse the SSI file every time?

I agreed that these benchmark is theoretical only, but just get me surprised.

Howard.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux