> On 6/15/07, Mark Watts <m.watts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 6/15/07, Boyle Owen <Owen.Boyle@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I'd try it and see - I think the worst that can happen is that you > > > > see no effect; ie, things don't get any better, they're unlikely to > > > > get worse. > > > > > > I'm just worried about what an "experimental" module might do to my > > > webserver's stability (which has so far been rock solid). > > > > > > Krist > > > > If you have no problems, why are you looking to introduce another module > > to add negligible benefit? > > I have no problems with the stability of my webserver. I do (or more > precisely my users) do have a problem with the _performance_ though. I > want to improve performance, but rather not decrease stability. Hence > my question. Assuming your content working set is small enough to fit in your operating-system's disk caching system, you probably won't see any performance benefit with mod_disk_cache. If you care to divulge a little more about what the back-end of your website does (php talking to a database or tomcat, or what?), maybe we can suggest some things to try. Mark. -- Mark Watts BSc RHCE MBCS Senior Systems Engineer QinetiQ Trusted Information Management Trusted Solutions and Services Group GPG Key: http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/search?q=0x455420ED
Attachment:
pgpa9ezkUx0rK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|