Re: BerkeleyDB RewriteMap on NFS - problems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/19/06, Julian Dunn <Julian_Dunn@xxxxxx> wrote:

1) Is it bad to put BDB RewriteMaps on an NFS server? Is anyone else
doing it without problems?
2) Is it true that some versions of BerkeleyDB don't have "read-only"
semantics, and could this be causing the problem?
3) Is the problem here related to incorrect POSIX file-locking
semantics on the NFS server as some of my colleagues at work have
implied? This NFS server hardware is fairly recent (purchased within the
last 3 years) so I'd be very surprised if this were the case.
4) Could it be possible that this is just tickling a bug in the Linux
kernel? We're running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9.

I'm not at all an expert in this, but my understanding is that using
berkeley DB over NFS -- even for read-only access -- is asking for
trouble.  Oracle has this to say about it:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/env/remote.html
which seems to suggest that read-only access is possible.  But I'd
think all bets are off if you change the database, even from the local
machine.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux