Re: Comparing Apache HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joshua,

Thanks. I think what you mention makes sense - but i still wanted to make
sure i was not missing anything major before going down the 2.0.* path. My
initial plan was to look at the 2.2.* release but based on some initial
configuration that i tried, the WLS plugin which is part of WLS 9.2 is not
compatible with the 2.2.* release.

Thanks

Ramdas


                                                                           
             "Joshua Slive"                                                
             <joshua@xxxxxxxx>                                             
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             jslive@xxxxxxxxx          users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              
             No Phone Info                                              cc 
             Available                                                     
                                                                   Subject 
                                       Re:  Comparing Apache  
             11/22/2006 12:47          HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*            
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             users@xxxxxxxxxxx                                             
                   e.org                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




On 11/22/06, Ramdas.Hegde@xxxxxxxxxxx <Ramdas.Hegde@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I  was looking for articles/notes on comparing the HTTP server
performance
> between the 1.3 and 2.0.* releases. The application that we plan on
hosting
> will use the Apache HTTP server to forward requests to a Weblogic Server
> cluster  using the WLS plugin - all running on RHEL. The static component
> that would be served by the Apache HTTP server would be minimal.

I don't think you'll find much useful info on that question.  The
performance of the two would probably be very similar under those
conditions, although the specifics of the setup can always make a
difference.

The real question you should be asking yourself is if you really want
to start a project with a server that hasn't had any serious
development work in over 5 years.  If so, I hope you don't need IPv6,
caching, threading, sendfile, filtering, largefile support, accept
filters, or any of the thousands of other improvements that have gone
into the 2.x series.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux