Re: Comparing Apache HTTP server 1.3 vs 2.0.*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/22/06, Ramdas.Hegde@xxxxxxxxxxx <Ramdas.Hegde@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I  was looking for articles/notes on comparing the HTTP server performance
between the 1.3 and 2.0.* releases. The application that we plan on hosting
will use the Apache HTTP server to forward requests to a Weblogic Server
cluster  using the WLS plugin - all running on RHEL. The static component
that would be served by the Apache HTTP server would be minimal.

I don't think you'll find much useful info on that question.  The
performance of the two would probably be very similar under those
conditions, although the specifics of the setup can always make a
difference.

The real question you should be asking yourself is if you really want
to start a project with a server that hasn't had any serious
development work in over 5 years.  If so, I hope you don't need IPv6,
caching, threading, sendfile, filtering, largefile support, accept
filters, or any of the thousands of other improvements that have gone
into the 2.x series.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux