On 8/2/06, Vincent Bray <noodlet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/2/06, David Pratt <fairwinds@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Vincent. I have NameVirtualHost(s) set up as follows. > > NameVirtualHost *:80 > NameVirtualHost *.443 > > Sorry I did not include this in my previous message. The twisted SSL > server is pretty much stand alone and uses its own certificate source. > What I want to do is have the server running on localhost:8443 proxied > on 443 for a particular path. Will I still need Apache's SSLEngine for > this?
Hi, Looking in to this a little further (thanks google) has confirmed what I thought; that reverse proxying ssl is largely pointless. This rather old message explains the scenario: http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200005/0744.html That leaves you either, a) forgetting about ssl authentication between the user agent and zope, b) exposing zope to the client directly, or c) using something at the tcp level to forward the encrypted connection to zope's port. -- noodl --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|