Joshua Slive wrote:
On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <forrie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2? Thanks. usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_cache.soUse 2.2. There are few good reasons to use 2.0 over 2.2. The upgrade is very easy. And mod_cache and mod_disk_cache are vastly better in 2.2. mod_mem_cache probably isn't perfectly stable in either version, and mod_file_cache hasn't changed much since 1.3. Joshua.
I'm unable to find the RPMs for Fedora or CentOS (which we're using) that correspond to 2.2.x. Well, actually, I found a src RPM, which is being compiled with options I need to customize (possibly via rpmbuild) - I'm from FreeBSD, so RPM is very new ;-)
It has several dependencies. Suggestion(s) welcomed.We already have httpd-2.0 installed on the designated system, which is why I asked.
I believe our goal is to utilize the mod_mem_cache on the front-end image servers.
What particular problems have been observed with mod_mem_cache? Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|