Re: [users@httpd] mod_*_cache on 2.0 vs. 2.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/25/06, Forrest Aldrich <forrie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is the difference in stability (etc) with these options on
httpd-2.0 and httpd-2.2?

Thanks.

usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_mem_cache.so
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_file_cache.so
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_disk_cache.so
usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_cache.so

Use 2.2.  There are few good reasons to use 2.0 over 2.2.  The upgrade
is very easy.  And mod_cache and mod_disk_cache are vastly better in
2.2.  mod_mem_cache probably isn't perfectly stable in either version,
and mod_file_cache hasn't changed much since 1.3.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux