Re: [users@httpd] Is it common to use reverse proxy and virtual hosting together?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/14/06, James W. Anderson <jwanderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> These applications fail when served by the reverse proxy because, to the
> browser, the URL is relative to the root of the reverse proxy host, not the REAL
> application host.  The reverse proxy returns a 404 because there is no virtual
> directory/application named "cgi-bin", and our administrator won't let us define
> one to point to cgi-bin on our app server, because it's a common name2.
> Unfortunately, these are older applications that we purchased from a third party
> that no longer supports, so we can't change the application to use a more
> flexible relative URL.

The third-party module mod_proxy_html can solve problems like this. 
But I agree with you that virtual hosting on the proxy is the simplest
and best technique.

Joshua.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux