Re: [users@httpd] Scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Scripts
From: Joshua Slive <joshua@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:11:45 -0500
Delivered-to: apmail-httpd-users-archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: apmail-httpd-users-archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <001c01c61241$203a8c80$1f5c7580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <779d46e3005de2c9ff27eab4722330e3@localhost> <006001c61221$b042daf0$0100a8c0@ted> <200601051247470043.14D14238@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <001c01c61241$203a8c80$1f5c7580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 1/5/06, David Salisbury <salisbury@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> but you could run it still as cgi, though it's not recommended for security reasons..

Hmmm... I think you mean performance reasons.  Security-wise, cgi is
probably better than the module interface because it is more isolated
from the rest of the server.

Joshua.

References:
- Re: [users@httpd] Scripts
  - From: rob
- Re: [users@httpd] Scripts
  - From: Octavian Rasnita
- Re: [users@httpd] Scripts
  - From: Steven Pierce
- Re: [users@httpd] Scripts
  - From: David Salisbury

Prev by Date: Re: [users@httpd] Please HELP!!! bizzare Doc root problem!!
Next by Date: Re: [users@httpd] cgi & pl on apache ?
Previous by thread: Re: [users@httpd] Scripts
Next by thread: [users@httpd] libgcc dependency problem with 2.0.55
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux