On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 03:53:06AM -0000, users-digest-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:26:00 -0500 > From: Joshua Slive <jslive@xxxxxxxxx> > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache broken in 2.2.0 ? > > On 12/9/05, Dick Snippe <Dick.Snippe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > we use apache-2.0.x as a reverse caching proxy, using mod_cache, > > mod_mem_cache, mod_proxy and mod_proxy_http. > > It wouldn't surprise me terribly if mod_mem_cache was broken in 2.2. > It has received much less TLC than mod_disk_cache. Given the lack of > response here, you should probably file a bug report. Is there anybody on this list who has apache-2.2 + mod_proxy + mod_cache working as a reverse proxy? I'd be very interested in their config... Btw: i tried both mod_mem_cache and mod_disk_cache. Both didn't work. Not with mod_proxy_http and mod_proxy_ajp. > Under many circumstances (especially on an OS with an efficient > sendfile syscall) you'll find that mod_disk_cache will be faster > anyway, since it passes much of the memory management job on to the OS > where it can be handled more efficiently. So one option would be to > move to mod_disk_cache. Which sounds like good advice. In apache-2.0 mod_disk_cache appeared to be a lot less well maintained than mod_mem_cache. Hence our preference for mem_cache. -- Dick Snippe - een Coordinator Publieke Omroep Internet Services Gebouw 12.401 (peperbus) Sumatralaan 45 Hilversum \ fight war tel +31 35 6774252, email beheer@xxxxxxxxx []() \ not wars --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|