On 12/7/05, Michael Jeung <mjeung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yesterday afternoon, we put this new server into production and it > seemed to be behaving relatively OK, with system-load of 4-5. We > thought everything was going well and that this issue was wrapped > up. Serves us right - today we got into the office and found that > loads on our server had spiked to 150. > > Before we pulled the server from production, we grabbed a few > snapshots of what the system was doing. After taking a look at > these, I haven't been able to make much head-way. If someone with > more experience in this matter could take a look, I would greatly > appreciate it. You need to use tools like mod_status, your access_log, strace, and a debugger to see what those processes are actually doing. Given the amount of memory they are using, they clearly aren't serving static files, so this is likely something php or database related. > > Ultimately, my goal here is to get Apache to behave. Any solution > that will allow Apache to run without killing the server is > acceptable -- including upgrading to Apache 2. (Does Apache2 > outperform Apache 1.3?) Apache 2 will outperform 1.3 in some cases because of sendfile support, among other things. But since your site looks very php/database dependent, it's unlikely changing the underlying web server will have any measurable effect. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx