I'm assuming that compiler optimizations would make both patches "six to
one, half dozen to the other" as far as code path followed during the
request cycle... but I agree.
Fixed in trunk in r1737114 and proposed for backport in 2.4 in STATUS.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 3/30/2016 8:02 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
>
> But the attached patch is not correct. IMHO it needs to be
>
>
>
> Index: request.c
>
> ===================================================================
>
> --- request.c (revision 1735931)
>
> +++ request.c (working copy)
>
> @@ -1009,7 +1009,9 @@
>
> /* No htaccess in an incomplete root path,
>
> * nor if it's disabled
>
> */
>
> - if (seg < startseg || (!opts.override &&
> opts.override_list == NULL)) {
>
> + if (seg < startseg || (!opts.override
>
> + &&
> apr_is_empty_table(opts.override_list)
>
> + )) {
>
> break;
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Rüdiger
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|