Probably the wrong mailing list ;) Regards, Yann. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Kevin A. McGrail <KMcGrail@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC >> with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been >> hit by DCC which is completely by design. > > Vernon replied off-list so I wanted to bring the relevant portion back to > the list: > > "My general suggestion is that SA+DCC clients that don't use whitelists for > bulk mail (I still say whitelists are required) should use a DCC score that > is not large enough to tell SA to mark a message "spam" purely from the DCC > result, but large enough to push other signs of spam over the threshold. > vjs" > > So I think DCC users should consider moving DCC to an __ test and identify > things like DNSBLs with whitelist entries and other tests that can use DCC > to meta more effective classification rules. > > Anyone has any thoughts on rules to submit, let me know! > > Regards, > KAM > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|