Fwd: Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC
> with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been
> hit by DCC which is completely by design.

Vernon replied off-list so I wanted to bring the relevant portion back to the list:

"My general suggestion is that SA+DCC clients that don't use whitelists for bulk mail (I still say whitelists are required) should use a DCC score that is not large enough to tell SA to mark a message "spam" purely from the DCC result, but large enough to push other signs of spam over the threshold. vjs"

So I think DCC users should consider moving DCC to an __ test and identify things like DNSBLs with whitelist entries and other tests that can use DCC to meta more effective classification rules.

Anyone has any thoughts on rules to submit, let me know!

Regards,
KAM





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux