Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There was one for 2.0->2.2, so having one for 2.2->2.4 makes
sense, and should be easy.

On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Yehuda Katz <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Should add that they even provided a script for renaming:
> /usr/share/doc/apache2/migrate-sites.pl
> 
> 
> 
> - Y
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Yehuda Katz <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, as I recall, conf files also changed to require having a .conf suffix,
> which also meant every conf file had to be renamed + all old symlinks removed
> (from sites-enabled) + all domains re-enabled.
> 
> Is that a Debian thing?  Apache httpd didn't make any such change.
> 
> This is a Debian change.
> The Apache wiki should probably be updated too: https://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout#Debian.2C_Ubuntu_.28Apache_httpd_2.x.29:
> 
> From /usr/share/doc/apache2/README.Debian.gz (in Ubuntu 14.04):
> 
> The Include directives ignore files with names that do not end with a
> .conf suffix. This behavior has changed from previous releases!
> 
> - Y
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx






[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux