Among other things I'm sure many are using modules that just plain
won't build/run for 2.4.x. For example, I know at a place I worked a
few years ago they were using a module that an app server depended on
which would not build for anything beyond Apache 2.2 (we tried,
believe me).
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it's good, but most of my clients already had their share of pain
> from Apache 2.0.x to 2.2.x.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Joey J <Joey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only used
>> by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The Apache
>> foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and looking
>> at the improvements I see significant value in several. I don't see any
>> reason why anybody wouldn't want to use it but the community seems to think
>> it's bad.
>>
>> What am I missing??
>>
>> Current market share:
>> http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ws-apache/2.4/all
>>
>> -Joey J
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>
> --
> [ ]'s
>
> Filipe Cifali Stangler
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|