Among other things I'm sure many are using modules that just plain won't build/run for 2.4.x. For example, I know at a place I worked a few years ago they were using a module that an app server depended on which would not build for anything beyond Apache 2.2 (we tried, believe me). On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Filipe Cifali <cifali.filipe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think it's good, but most of my clients already had their share of pain > from Apache 2.0.x to 2.2.x. > > > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Joey J <Joey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only used >> by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The Apache >> foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and looking >> at the improvements I see significant value in several. I don't see any >> reason why anybody wouldn't want to use it but the community seems to think >> it's bad. >> >> What am I missing?? >> >> Current market share: >> http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ws-apache/2.4/all >> >> -Joey J >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > > > > -- > [ ]'s > > Filipe Cifali Stangler --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|