>> Nobody has posted httpd binaries for Windows to httpd.apache.org in quite >> a while, and they were never "official" anyway, whatever that means. > > > Not true. Cf: > http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/FAQ#Why_isn.27t_there_a_binary_for_my_platform.3F > Binaries for Windows are official stuffs. Or if you like, they are *de > facto* official stuff provided by Apache. "Right now, there are none. The Apache Software Foundation produces Open Source Software. The 32 bit binaries provided are a courtesy of the community members." > >> >> Windows is of course supported in the source, and as someone else pointed >> out there are non-ASF providers of binaries for Windows. > > > But the lack of specific source for Windows in official FTP server make us > think otherwise. There used to be a post-processed archive of the source for windows as a convenience. It's the same code. > But I'd rather like a *clear-cut* situation/announcement instead of an ambiguous one. I guess it would help to fix these two things: * download page to not say "unix source". I'll take that as a TODO. * pub/httpd/binaries/win32/README should have a blurb saying these are sometimes contributed -- Eric Covener covener@xxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|