Re: OpenSSL vs. Mozilla's NSS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Is it possible to use Apache with the NSS libraries instead of OpenSSL?
> 
> Oops, I just found mod_nss.
> 
> But I would appreciate any comments about the use of mod_ssl versus mod_nss.

I've used both, and I now prefer mod_nss, because I find the configuration a
little easier.  With mod_ssl I have to specify all of the certificate file names
in the configuration (SSLCertificateKeyFile, SSLCertificateFile,
SSLCertificateChainFile).  With mod_nss I just load all of the keys and
certificates into the database, specify one mnemonic name in the configuration
(NSSNickName), and mod_nss then figures out and serves up the whole certificate
chain.  I also like certutil and pk12util for managing the key+cert database.

But the functionality is identical, and the differences are minor.  It's
basically going to depend on which toolset you like best - mod_ssl + openssl, or
mod_nss + certutil/pk12util.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux