On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Overall, I'm struggling to see how Apache continues to fit in a world with >> WebSockets and asynchronous IO playing a larger role. Java servlet engines >> and app servers are jumping on supporting this. We use Apache for load >> balancing over multiple Tomcat instances and for authentication, including >> its support for SiteMinder and other authentication plug-ins, so I really >> want to see it just handle WebSockets and asynchronous IO on all platforms >> and with SSL. If that's not in Apache's near-term future, however, that may >> force a re-think of Apache's role here. > > There's only support for one asynchronous handler, mod_serf, and it's > tied into the event MPM kind of directly IIRC. In other words, > everything else ties up a thread while waiting on e.g. proxy I/O or > CGI output. > > I don't think anyone is working on making Apache a websockets proxy, > much less an efficient one (much less including Windows in that > efficiency side of the equation). I believe it boils down to being an > efficient TCP proxy which is not the best fit for jamming into Apache > beyond port sharing (but if you had a great TCP proxy, you could just > put it in front). caveat: little or no practical interest/experience in websockets so could be way off base. -- Eric Covener covener@xxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|