On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm just saying the documentation of the new matching scheme is >> deceptive, not that any code should be changed.. > > Operative point I'm trying to make is that there should not be a new > matching scheme -- at best only new doc that didn't get backported > since it also dropped _default_ and NameVirtualHost which we're saying > were basically unnecessary. Completely agree.. In the end, my only point is that the example in the doc is counter to actual behavior, not proposing any code changes :) A doc change would prevent 2.4 nu bee problems in future .. Cheers Brett -- The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education. Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx