On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Tianyin Xu <tixu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:yes, that's how I understand it.
> Hi, Eric,
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> I see! Without NameVirtualHost, I will see the log message like "[warn] XXX
> VirtualHost overlap on port XX, the first has precedence"
>
> So, the NameVirtualHost detective is only useful for the same ip:port case
> (with different hostnames), right?
> In other words, if all the <VirtualHost> blocks have different ip:port
> pairs, there's no need to declare "NameVirtualHost" (since they can be
> differentiated by ip:port so that they are actually not name-based virtual
> hosting).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|