On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Tianyin Xu <tixu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, Eric, > > Thanks a lot! > > I see! Without NameVirtualHost, I will see the log message like "[warn] XXX > VirtualHost overlap on port XX, the first has precedence" > > So, the NameVirtualHost detective is only useful for the same ip:port case > (with different hostnames), right? > In other words, if all the <VirtualHost> blocks have different ip:port > pairs, there's no need to declare "NameVirtualHost" (since they can be > differentiated by ip:port so that they are actually not name-based virtual > hosting). yes, that's how I understand it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|