Re: apr_off_t mismatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09.11.2011 22:17, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/9/2011 11:52 PM, Asaf Dalet wrote:
the precompiled apache version is definitely 2.2.0 (according to httpd
-V) and there is
definitely some mismatch between request_rec size between it and my
compiled module. Of
course i don't know it for sure because i don't know the exact
sizeof(request_rec) in the
precompiled apache. In my module the sizeof is 424.

What does it say for the APR version from httpd -V? That is the
element that has control over apr_off_t structs.

It sounds as if the packagers of this particular precompile happened
to override our preference to define LARGE_FILES whenever possible
for APR versions from 1.0 onwards.

There was an APR bug fixed in APR 1.2.10, where LFS detection failed on Solaris when the build was done on NFS (I was bitten by that myself in 2007). Maybe that happened here too?

See:

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42821

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-commits/200707.mbox/%3C20070705220704.307FA1A981A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx%3E

Regards,

Rainer


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux