Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Do not set drr on pipe commit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[Public]


Hi Michel,

You confirmed in another thread the monitor specific quirk for disabling FAMS fixed your hang. Fixes references the commit which adds such quirk:

de1da2f7fe25 drm/amd/display: Add monitor specific edid quirk

The intention is that these two patches should only be merged into stable trees after applying the monitor specific quirk.

--

Regards,
Jay

From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2023 6:05 AM
To: Pillai, Aurabindo <Aurabindo.Pillai@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chalmers, Wesley <Wesley.Chalmers@xxxxxxx>; Siqueira, Rodrigo <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx>; Wheeler, Daniel <Daniel.Wheeler@xxxxxxx>; Mahfooz, Hamza <Hamza.Mahfooz@xxxxxxx>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Wentland, Harry <Harry.Wentland@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Do not set drr on pipe commit
 
On 7/5/23 20:07, Aurabindo Pillai wrote:
> From: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@xxxxxxx>
>
> [WHY]
> Writing to DRR registers such as OTG_V_TOTAL_MIN on the same frame as a
> pipe commit can cause underflow.
>
> [HOW]
> Move DMUB p-state delegate into optimze_bandwidth; enabling FAMS sets
> optimized_required.
>
> This change expects that Freesync requests are blocked when
> optimized_required is true.
>
> Fixes: de1da2f7fe25 ("drm/amd/display: Add monitor specific edid quirk")

Seems like inappropriate use of Fixes:, or how does this commit "fix" the referenced commit?

(Also a bit surprised to learn about that one only now, and that it landed without my confirming it actually works)


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer            |                  https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast          |         Mesa and Xwayland developer


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux