Dear Jun,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 23.03.22 um 04:02 schrieb Ma, Jun:
On 3/22/2022 9:33 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 22.03.22 um 13:53 schrieb Ma Jun:
Correct the parameter name of amdgpu_ring_init() in header file.
Maybe write "Sync up header and implementation to use the same parameter
names", otherwise somebody could think that this is a real functional
bug fix and backport it.
ok, will fix this in v2
(Your mailer incorrectly quoted your reply sentence, making it look like
it was written by Christian.)
If you re-roll the patch, please also mention both parameter names in
the commit message, so people do not have to search in the diff for
them, and can verify the changes match your intention. (The summary uses
singular *name* adding a little confusion.)
Kind regards,
Paul
Signed-off-by: Ma Jun <Jun.Ma2@xxxxxxx>
With the commit message and subject adjusted the patch is Reviewed-by:
Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Change-Id: I202d76ba04b137926b456b1c8a4c05a5b1a01bff
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
index 5320bb0883d8..317d80209e95 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
@@ -300,8 +300,8 @@ void amdgpu_ring_generic_pad_ib(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_ib *ib);
void amdgpu_ring_commit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
void amdgpu_ring_undo(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
int amdgpu_ring_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
- unsigned int ring_size, struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq_src,
- unsigned int irq_type, unsigned int prio,
+ unsigned int max_dw, struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq_src,
+ unsigned int irq_type, unsigned int hw_prio,
atomic_t *sched_score);
void amdgpu_ring_fini(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
void amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait_helper(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
