Dear Nikola, dear Augustin,
Am 15.10.21 um 20:43 schrieb Agustin Gutierrez:
From: Nikola Cornij <nikola.cornij@xxxxxxx>
[why]
The original latencies were causing underflow in some modes
Which modes exactly? On what hardware? How can it be reproduced?
[how]
Replace with the up-to-date watermark values based on new measurments
measurements
How can these measurements be done?
Kind regards,
Paul
Reviewed-by: Ahmad Othman <ahmad.othman@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Agustin Gutierrez Sanchez <agustin.gutierrez@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij <nikola.cornij@xxxxxxx>
---
.../amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_clk_mgr.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_clk_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_clk_mgr.c
index 3fae1f1f028d..0088dff441da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_clk_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn31/dcn31_clk_mgr.c
@@ -371,32 +371,32 @@ static struct wm_table lpddr5_wm_table = {
.wm_inst = WM_A,
.wm_type = WM_TYPE_PSTATE_CHG,
.pstate_latency_us = 11.65333,
- .sr_exit_time_us = 5.32,
- .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 6.38,
+ .sr_exit_time_us = 11.5,
+ .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 14.5,
.valid = true,
},
{
.wm_inst = WM_B,
.wm_type = WM_TYPE_PSTATE_CHG,
.pstate_latency_us = 11.65333,
- .sr_exit_time_us = 9.82,
- .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 11.196,
+ .sr_exit_time_us = 11.5,
+ .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 14.5,
.valid = true,
},
{
.wm_inst = WM_C,
.wm_type = WM_TYPE_PSTATE_CHG,
.pstate_latency_us = 11.65333,
- .sr_exit_time_us = 9.89,
- .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 11.24,
+ .sr_exit_time_us = 11.5,
+ .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 14.5,
.valid = true,
},
{
.wm_inst = WM_D,
.wm_type = WM_TYPE_PSTATE_CHG,
.pstate_latency_us = 11.65333,
- .sr_exit_time_us = 9.748,
- .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 11.102,
+ .sr_exit_time_us = 11.5,
+ .sr_enter_plus_exit_time_us = 14.5,
.valid = true,
},
}
