On 2020-07-22 3:10 p.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote: > On 2020-07-22 8:51 a.m., Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> From: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> drm_atomic_crtc_check enforces that ::active can only be true if >>> ::enable is as well. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks fine to me. The check is sufficiently old enough that I don't mind > relying on the core for this either. > > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@xxxxxxx> > >> >> modeset vs modereset is a bit an inglorious name choice ... since this >> seems to be glue code and not part of core dc, maybe rename to >> enable_required/disable_required to keep it consistent with the >> wording atomic helpers use? DC also seems to use reset for a lot of >> other things already (state reset, like atomic, or gpu reset like >> drm/scheduler's td_r_), so I think this would also help clarity from a >> DC perspective. >> >> Patch itself is good, above just an idea for another patch on top. >> >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> Thanks for the reviews! I assume this will get picked up by a DC developer or Alex/Christian. > That sounds like a reasonable idea to me. These are used more as a > stream_changed / stream_removed flag, but I don't think these helpers > really need to exist at all. > > That could come as a follow up patch. Yeah, I'm leaving that to you guys. :) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
