On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0800, Prike Liang wrote: > This fix will handle some MP1 FW issue like as mclk dpm table in > renoir has a reverse dpm clock layout and a zero frequency dpm level > as following case. > > cat pp_dpm_mclk > 0: 1200Mhz > 1: 1200Mhz > 2: 800Mhz > 3: 0Mhz > > Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v12_0.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c > index e3398f9..d454493 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int smu_set_soft_freq_range(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_clk_type clk_type, > { > int ret = 0; > > - if (min <= 0 && max <= 0) > + if (min < 0 && max < 0) This change causes the following Coverity warning because min and max are both unsigned: int smu_set_soft_freq_range(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_clk_type clk_type, uint32_t min, uint32_t max) >>> CID 1460516: Integer handling issues (NO_EFFECT) >>> This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "min < 0U". 225 if (min < 0 && max < 0) 226 return -EINVAL; > return -EINVAL; > > if (!smu_clk_dpm_is_enabled(smu, clk_type)) _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx